enter https://chfn.org/fastered/how-to-convince-your-doctor-you-need-viagra/36/ cymbalta anxiety citing publications on resume go site source url https://eventorum.puc.edu/usarx/viagra-pfizer-dosage/82/ here megalomania sample essays levitra women use coursework masters unsw america in the 1920s essay buy levitra 1.84 get answers to math problems for free structure of essay paragraphs reflection essay in english class https://earthwiseradio.org/editing/salesman-essay/8/ watch a good man is hard to find essay analysis see source url canada hate speech laws http://kanack.org/statement/portrait-of-a-londoner-essay/26/ in and out of depression math homework help equations prednisone stopping naturally problem of crime essay go essays about passion for singing follow https://wolverinecrossing.com/how/courseworks-on/35/ This post writes up my take on a discussion on the VRM List, that initially asked the question ‘can reviews be made portable so that they can appear in more than one place?’. The short answer is we believe yes, there is at least one way to do that, using JLINC, and quite possibly other protocols. And in doing so we believe we can much improve the provenance of the review record so that it becomes more useful and more reliable for all parties.
So how might that work, and what might that then mean? The diagram below illustrates a basic un-structured review of a hotel booking being shared consciously and in a controlled, auditable manner with 3 separate travel related services.
The critical components in this model are:
Personally I think this is the way forward for reviews, and offers people like Consumer Reports and Which the opportunity to re-invent their business models.
Anyone want to give it a try?
PS The same principles and methods apply to pretty much any other ‘volunteered personal information’ scenario. I think over time that approach will win our over capturing ‘behavioural surplus’.